In the ongoing fight to protect the distinct population of great white sharks off the coast of California and Mexico, Oceana submitted a critical analysis of the federal Biological Review Team’s (BRT) status report used by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) as the basis for their decision not to list this West Coast population of apex predators under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). Our critical review found that the assumptions, methodologies, and findings in the BRT report erred in several key areas, including analysis of current abundance, bycatch mortality, trends in abundance, and overall risk to the population.
On the one hand, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) did affirm many of the facts we raised in our petition to list great white sharks as an endangered species, including the population estimates at the two known main aggregation sites (estimated by NOAA to total 320 sub-adult and adult white sharks), the bycatch estimates (estimated by NOAA to be approximately 200 white shark pups killed per year in Mexican and U.S. gillnet fisheries), and the designation of this population as a Distinct Population Segment, genetically separate from all other white shark populations worldwide. However, rather than basing their decision on these facts, NOAA decided not to list based primarily on guesses, assumptions, and beliefs that contradict with the best available science.
For example, without any hard evidence, the BRT report concluded that the abundance of adult female great white sharks is 400-1600 individuals, which is 8-34 times the estimated number of females in the primary aggregation sites from recent scientifically published studies.
Additionally, actual evidence on the frequency of which young white sharks are killed in fishing nets indicates a much higher bycatch mortality rate than the BRT report thought was possible. The federal report states that a bycatch mortality rate of more than 20% is “highly implausible.” However, according to published tagging studies, of 7 seven young great white sharks that were tagged, 5 of them were caught in gillnets shortly thereafter, and at least two of them died as a result of being captured in these fishing nets. This equates to a bycatch mortality rate of 29-43%. Capture in gillnets is documented in scientific publications and cited by the BRT report to be the number one known threat to great white sharks. If NMFS had acknowledged that the bycatch mortality rate could be much higher it would have resulted in a higher risk of extinction than what was concluded in the BRT report.
Finally, the BRT report used thresholds for extinction risk that were completely irresponsible. For example, under the report’s criteria, 100% of all the white shark pups would have to be killed every year for the population to be considered “near extinction.” Setting the bar of near extinction so high that all animals would have to be killed is simply inappropriate and irresponsible under the Endangered Species Act.
Ultimately, we fear the decision by NMFS may harm the future of these ancient sharks by failing to address the significant threats to the population. We believe that if the flaws in the BRT report are corrected, it could lead to a different conclusion regarding whether listing West Coast great white sharks under the Endangered Species Act is warranted.
We also submitted our analysis to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife which is poised to make a recommendation on California State Endangered Species Act listing to the California Fish and Game Commission in late February 2014. Almost one year ago the Commission unanimously voted to advance California white sharks to candidacy which means that these sharks are temporarily receiving the full protections afforded to other endangered species until the Commission takes final action. However, as the candidacy period expires in March 2014, we want to ensure the Commission formally adds these ecologically important sharks to the state’s Endangered Species List to retain current protections. The Commission is tentatively scheduled to take a final vote on the California listing in April 2014.
Our ocean needs great white sharks. They are important to maintaining healthy and diverse oceans and play a critical top-down role in structuring the marine ecosystem by keeping prey populations, such as sea lions and elephant seals, in check—further benefiting our fisheries and abundant wildlife.
Please help us in our efforts to protect U.S. West Coast great white sharks from extinction by signing a letter of support for their listing on the Endangered Species Act.
- Oceana’s New Report Highlights Uses, Benefits of Global Fishing Watch Technology Posted Mon, November 17, 2014
- Video: Humpback Whales Cause Quite the Surprise As They Hunt for Herring Posted Wed, November 19, 2014
- On World Fisheries Day, A Look at Oceana’s Work to Create Sustainable Fisheries (Photos) Posted Fri, November 21, 2014
- Ocean Roundup: Humpback Whale Scars Can Reveal Migration Patterns, Sea Star Die-Offs Linked to Virus, and More Posted Tue, November 18, 2014
- Extroverted Sharks and Stressed Penguins: Uncovering Personality in Ocean Animals Posted Wed, November 19, 2014