EU Council announces first-ever seafood trade ban against illegal fishing nationsAll Press Releases…
March 24, 2014
Contact: Marta Madina ( [email protected] )
Today, four leading environmental groups – Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF), Oceana, The Pew Charitable Trusts and WWF have welcomed a decision by the EU Fisheries Council to place trade restrictions on Belize, Cambodia, and Guinea for failing to cooperate in fighting Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. The decision means EU member states are now required to ban the import of fish from Belize, Cambodia, and Guinea and ensure that EU fishing vessels do not operate in the waters of these nations.
In addition to welcoming the ban’s approval by the EU’s 28 fisheries ministers, and praising the Commissioner for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Maria Damanaki, for her leadership, the NGOs are calling for greater transparency in the way the EU evaluates third countries’ efforts to fight illegal fishing. They are also calling on the European Commission to close a loophole that allows non-EU vessels fishing in the banned countries’ waters to continue exporting their catches to the EU, and to work with EU member states to strengthen efforts to keep illegally-caught fish off the dinner plates of European consumers.
The three countries were initially amongst eight countries identified by the European Commission in November 2012 for inadequate monitoring of their fishing fleets, neglecting to impose sanctions on illegal fishing operators, and failing to develop robust fisheries laws. In 2013 the Commission announced that Fiji, Panama, Sri Lanka, Togo, and Vanuatu had improved but that Belize, Cambodia and Guinea had not. Today’s Council decision confirms the Commission recommendation that the countries be formally blacklisted or “red-carded” and prevented from trading fish with the EU.
IUU fishing depletes fish stocks, damages marine ecosystems, puts legitimate fishers at an unfair disadvantage and jeopardises the livelihoods of some of the world’s most vulnerable communities. IUU fishing is estimated to cost between 7 and 17 billion euro annually, representing 11 to 26 million tonnes of catch. The EU IUU Regulation aims to deprive market access for illegal fish, by requiring “catch certificates” for imports into the EU, as well as banning the entry of fish from countries and vessels involved in illegal fishing.
A second round of “yellow cards” was issued by the European Commission in November 2013, with Curaçao, Ghana, and South Korea warned that they could also face the same set of trade measures if they do not cooperate in fighting IUU fishing. South Korean vessels have been widely documented fishing illegally in West Africa, causing significant impacts on coastal fishing communities and the marine environment. The organisations are calling on the EU to continue to show the same determination and resoluteness towards other countries that repeatedly fail to observe the rules.
Steve Trent, Executive Director of Environmental Justice Foundation said:
“Closing the world’s most valuable seafood market to countries that do not cooperate in fighting illegal fishing is a crucial step, and we applaud the EU for taking this decision. Whilst it is not perfect, the EU IUU Regulation is clearly the world’s leading piece of legislation in this field – there are already signs that coastal communities in West Africa are seeing the benefits of the EU’s action towards offending vessels and flag States.”
Maria José Cornax, Fisheries Campaign Manager at Oceana said:
“The EU's efforts to tackle IUU fishing worldwide have truly materialised today with this unprecedented step. We hope that fishing nations around the world are looking today at the EU's leadership, and are ready to follow this newly opened path towards the definitive elimination of IUU fishing."
Tony Long, Director, Ending Illegal Fishing Project at The Pew Charitable Trusts said:
“The Council, by adopting this red list on non-compliant countries, has achieved a milestone in fighting illegal fishing. This shows that the European Union is serious about confronting countries that do not stop illegal fishing or continue to trade in illegally caught fish.”
Eszter Hidas, EU Policy Lead for WWF's Transparent Seas Project said:
"WWF supports the EU's efforts to impose sanctions where necessary to ensure that marine ecosystems and livelihoods are not damaged by illegal and irresponsible fishing practices. There must be consequences for persistent inaction after repeated warnings. We expect that Belize, Cambodia and Guinea will now take immediate action to impose effective fishing regulations.”
The latest decision by European Fisheries Ministers was taken under powers in Council Regulation 1005/2008 (the “EU IUU Regulation”), which came into force in 2010. The regulation allows the EU to first “yellow card” non-cooperating third countries as a warning, and finally “red card” countries and impose a series of trade restrictions, if cooperation and commitment to implement key measures to combat IUU fishing – such as strengthening their vessels monitoring and sanctioning systems - are not demonstrated.
Belize, Cambodia, Fiji, Guinea, Panama, Sri Lanka, Togo and Vanuatu were officially warned that they could be designated as non-cooperating third countries in a Commission Decision published on 15 November 2012. The criteria used by the European Commission in designating non-cooperating countries are laid out in Article 31 of the EU IUU Regulation. The European Commission engaged in dialogue with the countries concerned, and gave them time to remedy the situation. Fiji, Panama, Sri Lanka, Togo and Vanuatu were judged to have taken sufficient steps to address their failures, whereas a Commission Decision published on 26 November 2013 subsequently identified Belize, Cambodia and Guinea as non-cooperating third countries. The vote on 24 March by the EU Agriculture and Fisheries Council confirms this decision.
 Agnew DJ, Pearce J, Pramod G, Peatman T, Watson R, et al., “Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing” (Marine Resources Assessment Group and University of British Columbia, 2009).